Re: Re: OT: What happened to uuencode?

Results:

[kurt@amber miscFiles]$ locate uuencode
/usr/share/man/ja/man1/uuencode.1.gz
/usr/share/man/ja/man5/uuencode.5.gz
/usr/share/man/pl/man5/uuencode.5.gz
/usr/local/directadmin/customapache/apache_1.3.28/icons/uuencoded.gif
/usr/local/directadmin/customapache/apache_1.3.28/icons/uuencoded.png
/var/www/icons/uuencoded.gif
/var/www/icons/uuencoded.png
[kurt@amber miscFiles]$
[download]

Looks like there are some man pages on the server, but not an executable.

Comment on Re: Re: OT: What happened to uuencode? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: OT: What happened to uuencode? by b10m (Vicar) on Jan 13, 2004 at 02:53 UTC
~~Besides the fact that this is horribly off-topic, the question doesn't really make sense neither ;)~~ Linux doesn't have a "minimal set of tools" that should be on each system. You -as r00t- may delete whatever you see fit. Apparantly, your sysadmin did indeed delete the binary, for there seem to be manual pages around. I've checked two systems (Slack and Debian) and the binary resides in /usr/bin/ on both machines I've checked. So, either install it (tarball/.deb/.rpm/.whatever), or -to make this a lil' more on topic- create a script that does the same, using Convert::UU :) Update: Edited (<strike>) to fit the completely altered root node ... -- b10m	[reply]
Re: Re: OT: What happened to uuencode? by kleucht (Beadle) on Jan 13, 2004 at 03:07 UTC
Guess I forgot to mention that this post was off topic. One of the systems I could not find uuencode on was a RedHat system that I installed myself a couple weeks ago. I checked all of the little check-boxes during the install, so I cannot explain why the file did not get installed on the machine. Because I did not delete it. Kurt	[reply]