in reply to Re: Code for elegance, code for clarity
in thread Code for elegance, code for clarity
He said routinely rejected theories and equations because they were too complex, every time saying God's universe would be governed by beautiful (&simple*) equations. Though I think String Theory is off in unprovable never-never-land, there was a lot that I learned from that statement.
* = By simple, I mean short an elegant, without a lot of fudge constants and operators, I'm not saving the Creator would be afraid of a flux integral or something like it :)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Code for elegance, code for clarity
by dd-b (Pilgrim) on Jan 14, 2004 at 04:10 UTC |