in reply to Re: ePod - write easy and simple in easy-POD, convert to POD, and from there you know the way.
in thread ePod - write easy and simple in easy-POD, convert to POD, and from there you know the way.

But the idea of ePod is to always convert it to POD, and produce nice well formated POD.

There is not a big difference between "can produce POD" (and HTML) and "always produces POD". So why a "But"?

What I think interesting on OODoc is the use of templates to generate the HTML. How they work?

Just like CGI templates: have a constant template, which indicates where dynamic data must be filled in. You can best look at the examples included in the distribution. For HTML you may need a lot of templates, but for POD it is very very simple.

In my experience, POD (being a visual markup language) does not contain sufficient information to create good HTML. The resulting HTML can be much nicer. See for instance the Mail::Box docs. For the author, it still looks like POD...

  • Comment on Re: Re: ePod - write easy and simple in easy-POD, convert to POD, and from there you know the way.