in reply to Re: DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules (lazy)
in thread DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules

For those who don't know what tye is joking about, see Are debuggers good?.

On the debugging suggestion, you're right that that is a faster approach. It wasn't the one that immediately came to mind for me, but that's life.

Of course I still suspect that running through the file with Text::xSV, once, will find your error pretty fast if there is an error in the file.

  • Comment on Re: Re: DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules (lazy)