in reply to Re: DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules (lazy)
in thread DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules
Hmm I thought that I already found where the problem is - record 3964, this is the one after which DBD::CSV stops noticing more records.
I just can find what exactly DBD::CSV finds wrong about that record/line, and more importantly - why doesn't it emit any kind of warning when it finds those 'corrupted' lines.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules (lazy)
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jan 16, 2004 at 15:27 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Re: DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules (lazy)
by Eyck (Priest) on Jan 16, 2004 at 16:11 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jan 19, 2004 at 05:43 UTC | |
by Eyck (Priest) on Jan 19, 2004 at 08:29 UTC |