in reply to Re: Re: How about class Foo {...} definition for Perl?
in thread How about class Foo {...} definition for Perl?
I don't think it will have that effect, though. If I understand you correctly, you have two groups of people: those who understand OO Perl and those who don't — and the latter group understands OO Java.
Your proposed solution is to create a third language, so that the second group of people don't have to learn OO Perl. So now you have people in three groups: those who know OO Perl, those who know Java-ish OO Perl, and those who know OO Java. The first group may be able to debug the generated code, if they know the Java-ish language. None of the other groups would.
Me, I'd just teach everyone who needs to write OO Perl OO Perl.
Update: But you must teach them something now! Why put an additional step in there?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: How about class Foo {...} definition for Perl?
by gmpassos (Priest) on Jan 18, 2004 at 01:25 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: How about class Foo {...} definition for Perl?
by gmpassos (Priest) on Jan 18, 2004 at 06:45 UTC |