in reply to Re: array sorting
in thread array sorting

Tsk, tsk.

Your code had only the reference to join when you posted, and after Caron showed the @{[ sort @animals ]} idiom, then you added that as well.

Not good, Roger. At least, acknowledge that it was an update. Don't learn from somebody else's worst practices.

The PM Observer

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: array sorting
by Roger (Parson) on Jan 29, 2004 at 22:38 UTC
    Damn, I thought nobody saw that. ;-)

    You must have seen my initial post within the first minute I posted, 'cause I updated my post before davido made his first post.

    I hesitated to include the interpolated hash slice solution initially because I think of it as an obfuscated over-kill, but included in my update for completeness. I was going to add the print "$_ " for @animals solution too but stopped short because that solution will print an additional blank space after the last element in the array, which I consider as not a proper solution.

    So the answer is -
    yes, I admit I have updated without labelling it as an update.
    no, I didn't see Caron's post before my update.

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom