in reply to Re: Re: Working of split
in thread Working of split

So, I guessed right. I also mentioned something about the number of arguments of split. Why don't you consult its manual page, and come back only if the manual page isn't clear?

Abigail

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Working of split
by Hena (Friar) on Feb 05, 2004 at 12:16 UTC
    Yes, is spotted it now... *reading*
    So -1 (any negative number) in limit in split will return all the empty trailing columns. Sometimes i feel like an braindead :P. Huoh.