It sounds like the other firm was trying to either obfuscate or ensure integrity of the emails. Probably both.
I'd bet money that the firm had to get their evidence through discovery, which means it's intermediary was a court house. If the court house required print outs that could explain it.
Want to support the EFF and FSF buy buying cool stuff? Click here.
| [reply] |
If you want to re-OCR, the "best" on a PC is ABBYY finereader. It is the OCR of choice by all the book scanning groups, and far better than any other competition. It can handle tiff's, is fast, and probably would be worth trying out.
| [reply] |
This could be true. I am new to the legal world and have no idea how that stuff works. I did hear, however, that the OCR was done off-shore to save money, which I think is mildly interesting, as I didn't know that companies did that sort of thing, though i guess that makes sense...
| [reply] |