in reply to Re: Re: Re: Alternation in pattern matches
in thread Alternation in pattern matches

Sorry, was just being overly terse; in full, that would be:
/TAG:(")?((?(1)[^"]+|[^"\s]+))(?(1)")/ ? $2 : "not_def"
(I had thought that \1 would work instead of (?(1)")), but it makes sense that it doesn't.)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Alternation in pattern matches
by ambrus (Abbot) on Feb 19, 2004 at 17:39 UTC
    Good idea: m/TAG:((")?)((?(2)[^"]+|[^"\s]+))\1/ ? $3 : 'not_def';, that didn't occur to me.