Re: Attempt to free unreferenced scalar

Well, the only problem I can see is your last line. Return is for subroutines, for modules you need only an expression that evaluates to one. Usually, we use just the number one. By itself.

Once I deleted the return it worked fine on my machine.

Update: seems I was wrong. see Mr. Muskrat's reply, below.

Code is (almost) always untested.
http://www.justicepoetic.net/

Comment on Re: Attempt to free unreferenced scalar

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Attempt to free unreferenced scalar by John M. Dlugosz (Monsignor) on Feb 23, 2004 at 04:26 UTC
I tried without the `return` keyword before posting, and the results were the same. A while back, someone pointed out that this return is allowed and more readable than a 1 hanging on the end of the file.	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Re: Attempt to free unreferenced scalar by jweed (Chaplain) on Feb 23, 2004 at 05:00 UTC
my perl gives me: `Can't return outside a subroutine` [download] perl -v: `This is perl, v5.9.0 built for i686-linux-thread-multi` [download] 5.8.3 gives me the same. Code is (almost) always untested. http://www.justicepoetic.net/	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Attempt to free unreferenced scalar by Mr. Muskrat (Canon) on Feb 23, 2004 at 05:04 UTC
When you `use VM_list;` that does not happen only when you try to run his module as a script.	[reply] [d/l]