in reply to Re: Stereotypes about perl
in thread Stereotypes about perl

Prior to your post, I didn't even know about PDL. I'm reading about it now, and it sounds like exactly what I need.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by perrin (Chancellor) on Feb 24, 2004 at 14:39 UTC
    The book "Mastering Algorithms with Perl" may also help you. It talks about PDL some.
Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by duff (Parson) on Feb 24, 2004 at 20:46 UTC

    For almost anything math related, PDL is the right choice in perl. Where I work, we've used PDL for harmonic analysis and linear regression on large data sets. We recently added some graphing capabilities that utilize PDL+GD . We are also exploring adding neural net predictive capabilities to our toolset using PDL.

    Hard core math-types balk at perl as being "slow", but PDL is anything but. It adds much of the same functionality as you would find in matlab to perl (The big advantage that matlab has over PDL are those toolboxes that you can get for matlab. PDL has nothing analogous yet, but given CPAN, it's only a matter of time).

    Where perl really wins is getting the data into and out of whatever format you need for your calculations. Matlab, though sophisticated, is still almost as clumsy as Fortran in this regard.

Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by bunnyman (Hermit) on Feb 25, 2004 at 15:46 UTC

    Be careful that your professor doesn't try to run your PDL program and it doesn't work because he/she didn't install PDL.