in reply to Re: Stereotypes about perl
in thread Stereotypes about perl
I don't think Perl needs to become "a better language" by any means. Perl6 will help the OO model, true, but it's rock solid as a language now. Java isn't in Universities due to corporations -- when NCSU switched, Java didn't have huge industry acceptance and app servers weren't that common -- it made a good *teaching* language, because it enforced OO principles and eliminated pointer-manipulation that a lot of weaker students couldn't handle. Perl isn't a good teaching language, hence at the undergrad level, it might be mocked. However, talk with your AI professor about functional concepts and more abstract stuff, and I bet he would be more willing to tolerate Perl than your data structures or CS1/CS2 professors. Also your Operating Systems folks will probably appreciate it since it can fork and manipulate pipes, etc -- just like C. There is a rigid part of university education that enforces OO dogma -- some of it is right, some of it is not -- it is your job to filter it out and extract what you can -- but what is taught to you is not neccessarily gospel.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by jacques (Priest) on Feb 24, 2004 at 19:42 UTC | |
by flyingmoose (Priest) on Feb 25, 2004 at 19:22 UTC | |
Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by ambrus (Abbot) on Feb 25, 2004 at 16:03 UTC |