in reply to Re: Stereotypes about perl
in thread Stereotypes about perl

If I can plug a fellow NC State grad (who probably posts here -- if you're here John speak up), NCSU didn't have a Perl course, and an undergrad (heck, a sophomore!) stepped up with his elite Perl skills and they let him teach a 1 credit hour class. Great stuff. I see Perl mostly mocked from OO folks, so reminding them that Perl has OO and showing them to CPAN may help. I also remember to bring up the phrases "ultimate glue language" and "swiss army chainsaw" as much as possible. Mentioning XS bindings, Inline::C, LWP, and the robot classes can't hurt either. Let them know all the things that Perl can do that their favorite language can't do in a non-trivial away. I think the academics who like Lisp and other functional languages would be happy with Perl. It's the OO types that need work. Perl proves styles can be mixed -- it's sort of post-modern mixed-media voodoo, and yep, that's threatening to a professor or student unwilling to take the leap and throw away preconceptions.

I don't think Perl needs to become "a better language" by any means. Perl6 will help the OO model, true, but it's rock solid as a language now. Java isn't in Universities due to corporations -- when NCSU switched, Java didn't have huge industry acceptance and app servers weren't that common -- it made a good *teaching* language, because it enforced OO principles and eliminated pointer-manipulation that a lot of weaker students couldn't handle. Perl isn't a good teaching language, hence at the undergrad level, it might be mocked. However, talk with your AI professor about functional concepts and more abstract stuff, and I bet he would be more willing to tolerate Perl than your data structures or CS1/CS2 professors. Also your Operating Systems folks will probably appreciate it since it can fork and manipulate pipes, etc -- just like C. There is a rigid part of university education that enforces OO dogma -- some of it is right, some of it is not -- it is your job to filter it out and extract what you can -- but what is taught to you is not neccessarily gospel.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by jacques (Priest) on Feb 24, 2004 at 19:42 UTC
    I don't think Perl needs to become "a better language" by any means. Perl6 will help the OO model, true, but it's rock solid as a language now.

    Perl6 revamps a lot more than the OO model. You should read the apocalypses.

      That's exactly what I was saying. It's a good language, Perl6 helps out alot. Of course, like any good Perl fan, I read the apocalypses -- every one of them -- exegesis too. And the State of the Onion section discussing Parrot for Brainf***. I liked that part best.
Re: Re: Re: Stereotypes about perl
by ambrus (Abbot) on Feb 25, 2004 at 16:03 UTC

    Very true. Show them that Perl has true closures just like lisp and they'll probably like it. (Well, commercial languages like Mathematica and Maple has them too.)