in reply to Shapes don't need inheritance
in thread inheritance and object creation

You too? I already explained to flyingmoose I was talking about shapes, not polygons. Why talk about polygons as well?

Abigail

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Shapes don't need inheritance
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Feb 25, 2004 at 19:51 UTC
    polygon: A closed plane figure formed by three or more line segments that do not cross over each other. (http://www.shodor.org/interactivate/dictionary/p.html)

    That is what most people refer to when they discuss shapes. Hence, why flyingmoose and I used the term polygon when replying to you.

    ------
    We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

    Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.

[reply]
      Yeah, sure, whatever. I give up. I can repeat over and over again I was talking about shapes, but you continue to insist in talking about something else.

      I'm done with this thread.

      Abigail

[reply]

In Section Meditations