I've used mrtg, and I'm far less than thrilled about it.
Unless the tool changed majorly the past year, its design
is fundamentally flawed. It makes you make decisions related
to how the data is going to be displayed when configuring
data collection/retention.
For instance, you let mrtg make yearly graphs about loadavg.
Almost always, your loadavg is less than 2, but you are very
interested in seeing when it's close to 2 and when it's below 1. But 6 months ago, an application went haywire, forked itself too many times, and your load avg briefly approached
100. Your yearly graph is now worthless, as that single spike dominates the picture, turning your graph almost into
a representation of a Dirac function. You can prevent yourself against that by having mrtg discard too high values, but then you have no history of the event. It doesn't allow to ignore spikes when displaying the results.
Anyway, this rant has little to do with Perl. Except that
I've written plotting applications many times in Perl, and
I vastly prefer them over mrtg. I never use any plotting
modules in my Perl program - I always open a pipe to gnuplot.
Abigail | [reply] |
i knew that was coming.
well i have looked at mrtg.
mrtg uses RRD tool (graphing and round robin database )
data aggregates and/or gets written over in time.
my people do not want aggregate data,want to see each polled value on a graph for a certain period.
| [reply] |