That is strange indeed. I kept experimenting and it seems when the argument to do is higher than the version of Perl running on the machine(even by fractions), that same type of error is thrown, where the 'required' version number is the same as the argument to do.
do 5.00504; print "\n"; print $!, "\n" if $!; # output: Perl 5.00504 required--this is only version 5.00503, stopped + at do.pl line 6.
Update: While using a number the same as the version of Perl, the only error thrown is:
No such file or directory
do 5.00503; print "\n"; print $!, "\n" if $!; # output: No such file or directory
But it's good to see that a bug has been reported on that.

Amel - f.k.a. - kel


In reply to Re: Re: The Behavior of 'do' by dsb
in thread The Behavior of 'do' by dsb

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.