If you want something better, at least in that regard, you could pick Math::Random::MT. It's pretty fast, too.
In reply to Re: rand() precision low, looking for a fast way to get high precision rand float?
by bart
in thread rand() precision low, looking for a fast way to get high precision rand float?
by Klaas
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |