Ok, I can agree with that - I don't see how that changes the results. Changed to -3.
Rate IRS_map Split IRS_while IRS_map 9659/s -- -26% -28% Split 13017/s 35% -- -3% IRS_while 13379/s 39% 3% --
Considering that a lot of time is in I/O (open and readline), I wonder if the differences between our results are due more to I/O characteristics on our systems than to the algorithm itself.
--MidLifeXis
In reply to Re^3: Benchmark results | localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR
by MidLifeXis
in thread Benchmark results | localizing $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR vs spliting contents of file on $INPUT_RECORD_SEPARATOR
by ashish.kvarma
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |