That's actually a pretty flaky technique.
use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; package Foo; 1; package main; print "Data::Dumper was ", defined $Data::{'Dumper::'} ? "loaded\n" : +"not loaded\n"; print "Foo was ", defined $::{'Foo::'} ? "loaded\n" : "not loaded\n"; print "Eata::Dumper was ", defined $Eata::{'Dumper::'} ? "loaded\n" : +"not loaded\n"; # Here's a false positive! # "Data::Dumper" was loaded, and that makes it look like # "Data" has also been loaded... # print "Data was ", defined $::{'Data::'} ? "loaded\n" : "not loaded\n" +; # Here's another false positive! # When we checked if "Eata::Dumper" was loaded, # autovivification makes it look like "Eata" was loaded. # print "Eata was ", defined $::{'Eata::'} ? "loaded\n" : "not loaded\n" +;
It's much better to check for the existence of the actual functions/methods you wish to use:
my $Dumper = UNIVERSAL::can('Data::Dumper', 'can') && 'Data::Dumper'->can('Dumper'); print $Dumper->($hashref) if defined $Dumper;
In reply to Re^4: How to get at perl's options in a program
by tobyink
in thread How to get at perl's options in a program
by mpersico
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |