Well, I agree with that PerlInterpreter will cause a size overload, but as I read now, Java`s default embed scripting language for end users is Rhino and it`s a javascript written in java. I was interested in Perl as end user script language instead of JS, because Perl is much more powerful and flexible, with CPan and the textual process power, so using Perl is definitely > than JavaScript. I don`t know if size overload is greater in priority than lose of functionality.
In reply to Re^2: Java programming and Perl
by heatblazer
in thread Java programming and Perl
by heatblazer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |