I'd love to! Unfortunately, it's proprietary, confidental. I would have loved to get peer review of the codebase, but that was forbidden also. Secret sauce.
Maybe I can cobble together a separate example that fails in a similar way...
...You know, actually I can't. I couldn't ever reproduce the problem on anything but those old rhel machines and I don't have access to them anymore (that project is done). The threads::shared code worked on all my own servers.
What I can do is share a sample (mock) marshalled datastructure "storable" that contains a datastructure which in all likelihood would have made the original code/server puke. The act of passing structs like the dummy storable I'll share with you is what made the segfaults happen.
I'll need a few hours before I can get that. It might be as long as tomorrow.
Maybe there's something to be learned here, which I would enjoy very much!
In reply to Re^7: removing all threads..
by Tommy
in thread removing all threads..
by ISAI student
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |