Well, I'd say the problem is that @{ } is defined syntactically as containing a full-fledged block (and thus it imposes its own lexical scope).
@$_{@tests} = (0)x@tests for \my %ntests;
- tye
In reply to Re^3: Two simple code style advice questions (my)
by tye
in thread Two simple code style advice questions
by eyepopslikeamosquito
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |