If I'm understanding you correctly, you're wanting to have your script spawn something that will go off and do some work. Then have the main script ignore what was spawned off and continue on without any delays. Is that correct?
The thought that popped into my mind was to use threads instead of forking. Just create a new thread and then detach it (or have the thread detach itself).
In reply to Re: Fork exec and not wait?
by dasgar
in thread Fork exec and not wait?
by packetstormer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |