It means code is clearer than words :) and your question is unclear (to me)
If I had the same question, first thing I would do is try to replicate it in a short self contained example, and then I'd either have a test case, or I'd figure out where I'm confused, or have some code to show what I'm trying to accomplish
Code can be much clearer than English
In reply to Re^3: Moose stringification overloading isn't working
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Moose stringification overloading isn't working
by dd-b
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |