The thing that surprises me though is that trying to increment the hash keys doesn't die like this one:
I agree, it seems odd. Consider:
#! perl use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dump; my %h = (1 => 'Fred'); dd %h; fn(%h); dd %h; sub fn { print "BEGIN fn()\n"; dd @_; $_[0]++; $_[1] = 'Barney'; dd @_; print "-END- fn()\n"; }
Output:
12:02 >perl 541_SoPW.pl (1, "Fred") BEGIN fn() (1, "Fred") (2, "Barney") -END- fn() (1, "Barney") 12:02 >
The hash value is clearly aliased, since the assignment in sub fn persists in %h after the sub returns. But the hash key is not: it appears to be copied (passed by value), as $_[0] behaves as a variable local to sub fn. (Whereas a literal value like 42 or 'Wilma' is aliased, as evidenced by the Modification of a read-only value error message which results from trying to increment it or assign to it within the sub.)
An anomaly? Or a feature?
| Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum | Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica, |
In reply to Re^2: Alias of hash-values?
by Athanasius
in thread Alias of hash-values?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |