it's a common idiom to use map to create listified hashes map { $_ => 0 } LIST
> (One that makes some sense!)
orthogonality always makes sense!
(at least in the long run ... have a look into the python world)
> Hm. You find that "obfuscated"?
local @_ ? are you serious?
> I always rated you as one of the more adept perlers.
can we have a technical discussion w/o talking about persons?
And cause you rated me, you'll maybe believe if I say that I already spend hours and days meditating about the problem to distinguish between arguments which are given as a plain list and a "list sigil" like %H or @A.
Prototypes are just not mature enough!!!
The optimal solution would ideally do lazy calculations. I did a talk about such constructs in Riga and GPW. But this is too much of a thread drift now.
Cheers Rolf
In reply to Re^10: Is there any difference between prototype % and @ ?
by LanX
in thread Is there any difference between prototype % and @ ?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |