doesn't even try to use the hmap or hgrep you defended so long
I made no attempt to "defend". There is nothing to "defend".
I offered an alternative, With reasoning. (I'm not forcing anyone to agree; nor use my ideas.)
you needed to introduce completely new hpairs
I use (or construct) the right tool for the job.
still needs a unhpairs to flatten LoA before assigning to a new hash after chain
Nothing new required, map serves the purpose perfectly.
I could already use my hmap in your solution, so no need to create hpairs
Look as hard as I might; I can't find your definition of hmap?
you really hate symmetry, don't you?
Nope! I "hate" very little. (And is that less "personal" that my recognising your ability?)
But I do not seek to artificially impose symmetry where it does not naturally belong.
In reply to Re^17: Is there any difference between prototype % and @ ?
by BrowserUk
in thread Is there any difference between prototype % and @ ?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |