I have my own projects to take care of. I've supplied you with code that measures both; and you have the problem.
The only way for either of us to determine whether your suggestions are improvements; is to try them: do they make lookups slower or faster; or use more or less memory?
If I do it, you remain a neophyte. If you do it, you become less of a neophyte.
In reply to Re^5: Store larg hashes more efficiently (10e6 md5s in 260MB at 4µs per lookup)
by BrowserUk
in thread Store large hashes more efficiently
by puterboy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |