I have to guess here, as it is too long ago to be sure, and trouble hit the fan at a customer site with less resources than where they had tested the script (which had to run a long analysis on two databases that took close to 30 hours, which makes it obvious why data corruption after 20+ hours is not an option.
I started Tie::Hash::DBD in August 2010, which makes me assume we ran perl-5.10.1/64all on HP-UX 11.11 (at the customer site) with DB_File-1.020 targetting libdb-4.2.52 (after which I stopped upgrading, as Oracle made it close to impossible to port).
Is that what you wanted to know?
In reply to Re^3: Problems with SDBM
by Tux
in thread Problems with SDBM
by Laurent_R
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |