No need to worry about narrowing your search or whatever. Hash lookups are fast.
The code below creates a hash for a 100 x 100 matrix. It also assumes that each matrix pair has a value (worst case, given your 'spec'). To simplify validation, I make this value 1, but changing it to any other number makes no difference to the time required for lookup.
Subsequently, I make another worst-case assumption, namely that your lists of search terms (what you call Subset 1 and Subset 2) are maximally large.
On my machine, it finishes before I can blink. Run it and see:
use strict; use warnings; # Create 100 x 100 datastructure: my @uc = ( 'AA' .. 'DV' ); my @lc = ( 'aa' .. 'dv' ); my %index; for my $k ( @uc ) { for my $v ( @lc ) { $index{$k}{$v} = 1; } } # Parse it: my $score; for my $k ( @uc ) { # or: for my $k ( @subset_1 ) for my $v ( @lc ) { # or: for my $v ( @subset_2 ) $score += $index{$k}{$v} || 0; } } print $score;
In reply to Re: Two dimensional sets intersection
by Not_a_Number
in thread Two dimensional sets intersection
by menth0l
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |