I suppose there are hundreds of other ways to go about this. The reason I chose the above is that you could have millions of pieces of data to look at and exhaustively looking at each column would be a bit absurd. Besides, you would probably only need to 'catch' an error when trying to perform an activity with a subset like obtaining a standard deviation. In that case you would check each value anyway.
Celebrate Intellectual Diversity
In reply to Re: Best guess for data type
by InfiniteSilence
in thread Best guess for data type
by spiros
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |