I don't have a problem with "Perl Golf" short solutions ...:-)
There is nothing even remotely "Perl Golf" about that, IMHO that is practically a slur against perl, practically anti-perl-propaganda :)
However its obvious the OP (Original Poster) is not talking about those basic sorts of problems.
Sure its not :) Take for example Watching long processes through CGI (Aug 02), nothing particularly basic about it, sure its got 2 functions, but most of the code isn't in functions, less than 100 lines
Or take for example Text-CSV_XS-0.97/examples/csv2xls, 200 lines, one function( usage(), mostly string/heredoc)
Its easy to well past 1000 lines with this type of program, and its obvious to me this is the type of program the OP is talking about -- doesn't need modules or Test:: anything
In reply to Re^4: Developing code to be a module (perl -lanse)
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Developing code to be a module
by rpnoble419
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |