++ to all the good technical solutions provided so far. I am surprised that no one has
really spotted the underlying philosophical problems implicit in the question. First of
all, why using a DateTime object, when only a date has been specified? It seems
obvious that at least a time has to be added to the date information before the question
can be answered. Completeness of question is one of the highest principles (see for
example the works of Douglas Adams). Which time shall we add? Noon, midnight, else? Can we
be sure which one is "the best time of the day"? Time creates other
problems, of course, as Time is subject to relativity. Now Einstein has a lot of things
to say about this matter, but he had no great tools such as Perl, CPAN and other unnamed
utilities at hand. Having clarified the greater issues of the question, let's look at
the details: the string '19830501' and the requested answer “May 1,1983?” suggests a
pattern of yyyymmdd to be translated into month name, day of month, comma, four digit year,
question mark. Splitting up the input first. A recursive solution seems to be the best
approach as we first need to split the string into two halves of equal length, and the
apply the same to the second half that we have obtained. Recursion is a sound
principle applied to all important problems such as Towers of Hanoi and
others.
While the OP explicitly mentions DateTime to be employed solving his riddle, it
seems rather uncool to use the most obvious module available. There are so many modules
available on CPAN, so just using only one and the most obvious cannot be a good strategy.
Finding the name of the 5th month, for example, is far better done asking "Google"
Employing useful tools like LWP::UserAgent and HTML::Parser will easily
translate "name of 5th month in gregorian calendar" into "May".
One thing is still puzzling, now that we have solved most of the question: why
is the input surrounded by single quotes while the required answer has double quotes?
Perl is reacting rather different to the types of quotes. The interpolation feature of
double quotes allows for writing complicated strings in a short concise way whereas single
quotes help the programmer to ignore issues with characters like $, %, and @. By
the way, these characters are also called sigils in Perl, stemming from Latin sigillum.
The significance of these characters in Perl cannot be underestimated. In any case, the
unresolved question of the quotes prevents to provide any usable code here, but I
assume that the above exposition will be helpful for you to find the coolest solution yourself.
In reply to Re: Coolest way to decode YYYYMMDD?
by hdb
in thread Coolest way to decode YYYYMMDD?
by locked_user sundialsvc4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |