Err - yes. I wonder how I came to this interpretation and I'm sorry I did not test it before...
In reply to Re^6: Thoughts on replacing -> with .
by Corion
in thread Thoughts on replacing -> with .
by Aaronrp
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |