My mistake. I guess the hash of arrays would take up slightly more memory, because instead of using an array index to label individual arrays, it uses the column headers to label them. I imagine that if the number of columns is low, there wouldn't be a large difference?
Thanks for pointing that out!
-MichaelIn reply to Re^3: indefinite number of columns
by mtmcc
in thread indefinite number of columns
by torres09
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |