Interesting.
I'd hope that if P5P decides to implement a single, consistent PRNG, that they opt for a fast, non-cryptogrpahic, well-known and tested, and 64-bit (not 48; at least on 64-bit versions) such as:
And not just make one up.
In reply to Re^6: Is rand() really that slow or am I just using it wrong?
by BrowserUk
in thread Is rand() really that slow or am I just using it wrong?
by adiuva
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |