Took me a few dozen looks, I started to compose some funny(wrong) answers some 3-4 times
Makes me feel a little better that I'm not the only one had trouble seeing it :)
The experimental (??{ code }) feature looks kinda neat
Indeed. Trouble is I can never remember whether it is the (?{}) or (??{}) that interpolates; and rather than go look it up, I opt for an alternative if one springs to mind.
In reply to Re^4: Why doesn't this regex work? ( lookaround dynamic postponed pattern (??{ code })
by BrowserUk
in thread Why doesn't this regex work? (Solved!)
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |