Problem not in incorrect FastCGI usage and misunderstanding FastCGI specification, but in FCGI.pm implementation, that does not meet the modern requirements.
Then go ask the authors and maintainers of FCGI to re-write their perfectly working module to meet your "modern requirements".
But be warned: they'll laugh their heads off at your suggestions and requirements. The idea of mixing FastCGI with threading is stupid.
In reply to Re^9: [FCGI.pm] - not threads-safe?
by BrowserUk
in thread [FCGI.pm] - not threads-safe?
by zdm
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |