I agree with the other monks, there’s nothing wrong with using map. However, it is possible to get an equivalent result without map by rearranging and adding the /g and /m modifiers to the regex:
my @online_services = `svcs` =~ /^online.*svc:(.*?):/gm;
Note that this works because the binding operator puts its left-hand operand into scalar context; and backticks (or qx//) in scalar context return “a single (potentially multi-line) string” (Quote Like Operators).
My benckmark tests suggest that this approach may also be more efficient:
#! perl use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark 'cmpthese'; use Data::Dump; use experimental 'smartmatch'; my (@x, @y); cmpthese ( 100, { MAP => sub { @x = map { /\d+_(\S*?)\.pl$/ } `ls -l` }, G_MOD => sub { @y = `ls -l` =~ /\d+_(\S*?)\.pl$/gm }, } ); if (@x ~~ @y) { printf "The arrays are equal; each has %d elements\n", scalar @x; } else { print "The arrays are different:"; dd \@x; print "----------\n"; dd \@y; }
Typical output:
13:56 >perl 720_SoPW.pl Rate MAP G_MOD MAP 47.1/s -- -32% G_MOD 68.9/s 46% -- The arrays are equal; each has 619 elements 13:59 >
Note: Although I’m on Windows, I ended up using Cygwin’s ls -l command because `dir \n` gives an error, and `dir` causes the comparison test to crash. I don’t know what’s going on there. :-(
But by all means stick with map if you’re more comfortable with it.
Hope that helps,
| Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum | Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica, |
In reply to Re: Capturing regex from map
by Athanasius
in thread Capturing regex from map
by trippledubs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |