Thanks for the feedback. I agree with your points. I have been tripped up by that before/after effect in the past and needed to reorder my code to deal with it.
I had expected a minimal overhead and 2% reflects this. Obviously, being an integer percentage, it doesn't exhibit a huge amount of precision. I usually run Benchmark several times, throw away any outliers and report an average or range. In this instance, all 3 or 4 runs produced 2%. It indicates an overhead but I wouldn't be setting my watch by it. :-)
-- Ken
In reply to Re^5: Array of operators ...
by kcott
in thread Array of operators ...
by janDD
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |