Yes, you are absolutely right, this is definitely one of the main reasons why it is not clean in my mind (and I upvoted your comment). But you can also make a temporary copy if you want to keep the original array intact, no big deal if the data is nor too large. But again, I am not suggesting this as a good solution. It might just be a possible useful alternative in some edge cases or very specific context, although I fail to see any.
In reply to Re^5: Capturing regex from map
by Laurent_R
in thread Capturing regex from map
by trippledubs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |