"... I don't have a problem with it being "experimental"; as far as I have observed it hasn't changed in all the years it has been there ..."
When I read that this afternoon, that was my understanding too. However, poking aroung in perl5180delta some hours later (on a completely unrelated matter), I found: "/(?{})/ and /(??{})/ have been heavily reworked".
That's really just an FYI, if you're interested. It's still marked "experimental" and I saw nothing to indicate any specific performance enhancements.
-- Ken
In reply to Re^3: Named capture backreferences cannot be used in character classes?
by kcott
in thread Named capture backreferences cannot be used in character classes?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |