Thanks for posting your solution to this -- I've managed OK with regexps, but your post encouraged me to get a little more familiar with how lookaround assertions work. I'm going to document the regexp you've provided in order to show that I believe the instructions are still incorrect (see also my post here where I list all of the possible legal patterns that I think exist).
In reply to Re^3: perl look ahead regular expression that is optional?
by talexb
in thread perl look ahead regular expression that is optional?
by bigsipper
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |