Do you somehow think it contradicts what I said?
You're not very good at this are you.
What is the justification for "simplifying" code that has worked perfectly well for a dozen or more releases?
You mean, as far as its been considered, it probably didn't make things any worse.
Contradict? No.
Show up for the pointless, meaningless, politically motivated, incomplete and non-useful diatribe it is. Abso-frickin-lutely.
In reply to Re^5: Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?
by BrowserUk
in thread Truly randomized keys() in perl 5.17 - a challenge for testing?
by saintmike
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |