I'm not sure as I no longer have access to a SPARC machine to test. However, I do recall that sizeof() applied to a long double on the SPARC architecture showed that it used 16 bytes whereas a long double on x86_64 used only 12 bytes. This might imply increased precision on SPARC boxes, perhaps another Monk will have the access to test it out.
Cheers,
JohnGG
In reply to Re: powerpc double-double arithmetic
by johngg
in thread powerpc double-double arithmetic
by syphilis
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |