But what that really means is that you can't really use an XML parser at all to solve this problem. As pointed out above, it's easy enough to check for xml errors using xmllint, although the error reports you get can sometimes be difficult to interpret, and the actual problem can still be hard to spot.
I would be inclined to use a regex-based diagnosis - something like this:
That will at least give you a clear tally of imbalances (if any) in the open/close tag inventory for a given xml file. You should be able to use this information, together with the line numbers from the xmllint reports, to locate the problems.#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; my $infile = shift; # get input file name from @ARGV open( my $fh, "<:utf8", $infile ) or die $!; local $/; # slurp the whole file in the next line $_ = <$fh>; s/^<\?.*>\s+//; # ditch the "<?xml...?>" line, if any my %open_tags; my %close_tags; for my $tkn (split/(?<=>)|(?=<)/) { # split on look-behind | look-ahe +ad for brackets if ( $tkn =~ m{^<(\/?)(\w+)} ) { if ( $1 eq '' ) { $open_tags{$2}++; } else { $close_tags{$2}++; } } } for my $tag ( sort keys %open_tags ) { if ( ! exists( $close_tags{$tag} )) { warn sprintf( "%s: open tag %s is never closed in %d occurrenc +e(s)\n", $infile, $tag, $open_tags{$tag} ); } else { if ( $close_tags{$tag} != $open_tags{$tag} ) { warn sprintf( "%s: element %s has %d open tags but %d clos +e tag(s)\n", $infile, $tag, $open_tags{$tag}, $close_tags +{$tag} ); } delete $close_tags{$tag}; } } for my $tag ( keys %close_tags ) { warn sprintf( "%s: close tag %s has no open tags in %d occurrence( +s)\n", $infile, $tag, $close_tags{$tag} ); }
So, when you find these mismatched tags, isn't the next step to look at the process that is creating the xml files, and fix that? (These xml files aren't being created by manual editing, are they??)
(Update: BTW, I forgot to mention... this new information in your reply makes your OP even more egregiously obtuse. If you had said at the beginning, "I have this xml file that has an error in the tags, and I need to figure out how to find the problem," then the discussion would have been more effective. I know, you already feel bad about the OP, and I shouldn't pile it on, but it needs to be said.)
In reply to Re^3: Bug in XML::Parser
by graff
in thread Bug in XML::Parser
by manunamu
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |