It may not be idiomatic; or as concise; or as efficient; but there is no reason it cannot be readable.
It's just bigger, more lines of code. More characters in line. More scrolling needed.
thisis more readable than thisif ($x && $s =~ /(abc|def)/)
if ($x && index($s, "abc") >= 0 || index($s, "def") >= 0)
It is also a really strange claim. I mean, decently formatted C code is perfectly readable.Good C code is readable. But good perl code more readable than good C code.
Do you perchance mean "isn't considered readable" by YOU?Of course. Should I append "IMHO" to every my posting?
And if you are unfamiliar with Perl idioms; it is probably far more readable to you than idiomatic Perl.And if you are familar only with Assembler idioms, Assembler is more readable than Perl, and even more, than C
without citing the source of authoritycpan grep for index
In reply to Re^3: SUBSTR OR REGEX: WHICH WILL YOU FAVOUR?
by vsespb
in thread SUBSTR OR REGEX: WHICH WILL YOU FAVOUR?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |