Hi Monks
I've been writing some automation scripts using Strawberry Perl/DWIM Perl on Windows 7/2003/2008.
I was told by a senior at work to start using ActivePerl on Windows, stating that a lot of organizations prefer using ActivePerl because it has commercial support. Infact he stated that all the Perl Scripts running in production environment use Activestate. All the scripting work I have done are Windows Test/Certification Servers which dont have any production apps running on them.
Is this true? Are there any advantages of using Activestate Perl? I have been through the perlmonks site on a writeup on Activestate vs Strawberry that was written about a year ago, but have things changed?
Do organizations prefer or care if I use ActiveState or something else?
Hoping that I'll get some clarification on this topic.
In reply to Advantages of Activeperl vs Strawberry Perl by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |