Well, if there is not an unholy number of combinations of columns, then this is not a bad solution. If there is going to be a large number of 'different' statements prepared, then this is still ok, but I would just use prepare() instead of prepare_cached.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: A more elegant solution?
by runrig
in thread A more elegant solution?
by Cirollo
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |