... functionally similar ...
Its functionally superior but the namespace/syntax changes/inconsistencies/kludges will drive you mad
I've written many hundreds small less than 100 lines Tk programs, and about 10-20 Tkx ones ... Tkx hurts so much its not funny
In theory it sounds great, but whatever edge Tk.pm gives you in terms of perlishness/memorability/quickness Tkx just rips it out with the inconsistency
Tcl::pTk makes it bearable but needs more than Tcl::tkkit
I stick with Tk
If I absolutely must have the new Tcl/Tk widgets (which is never) I'll go for Tcl::pTk, but otherwise stick with Tk.pm
Tkx -- never again voluntarily (only for massive cash)
Re: TclTk interface with Perl code, is it possible? Re^2: GUI toolkit+designer for the perl newbie
In reply to Re^5: How can I install Tk perl module in 32-bit operating system and Windows7 ?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread How can I install Tk perl module in 32-bit operating system and Windows7 ?
by supriyoch_2008
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |